- From: Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 04:44:24 -0500
- To: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
- CC: discuss@apps.ietf.org, www-smil@w3.org
Patrik Fältström a écrit : > > At 14.39 -0500 00-12-07, Philipp Hoschka wrote: > >In general, I'm a bit confused about the request - why would the > >IETF have to comment on the minimal set of codecs in a format > >defined by another organisation ? This would make sense if the > >goal is to define a minimal set of codecs that need to be supported > >by MIME mail readers, but otherwise, I don't see the point - am > >I missing something ? > > Because they want to have the same codecs in the other organization > as we define for use in the IETF I guess. Sounds reasonable, but in which effort does the IETF define minimally required codecs for a format ? If such an effort exists, I guess we'd be interested to use the same codecs as well.
Received on Friday, 8 December 2000 04:49:00 UTC