- From: Graham Klyne <GK@dial.pipex.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 11:43:07 +0000
- To: Tom Harding <tomh@thinlink.com>
- Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org
At 08:16 09/02/99 -0800, Tom Harding wrote: [...] >On another note, has anyone here had a chance to look at my XP draft? We are >using XML for everything on the wire, and I thought it would be useful to take >a stab at formalizing that fact as a basis for many different kinds of >protocols. It tags requests and responses, as a wire protocol must, but a >software implementation could still take the "mux" approach. I have noted and very briefly scanned the draft, but not taken it in in any depth. At this stage, I think the choice of representation is secondary issue: first I think it is important to determine the semantics of what is to be achieved. #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 1999 06:43:00 UTC