W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-discuss@w3.org > December 1999

Re: IETF split? (was: HTTP Extensions Frameworkstatus?)

From: Richard Shockey <rshockey@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 15:31:20 -0600
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.19991207152130.00a425f0@127.0.0.1>
To: jg@pa.dec.com (Jim Gettys)
Cc: discuss@apps.ietf.org

>
>There are ways to "fix" this: another Apps AD, or some reader mechanism,
>or trying to make sure that Apps AD's can spend full or nearly full time
>on IETF business.  I suggest these long before doing application protocol
>standards work in other venues.
>                                 - Jim Gettys


I have specifically suggested adding a 3rd Apps AD to NONCOM. I do not 
think this will solve all of the problems but it could certainly help.

I also suggested a specific TELEPHONY area. With all of the related work 
that is going on it seems reasonable to seperate it out to permit TEL AD's 
a more focused approach to some of the looming and unresolved architectural 
issues.

I also totally reject the idea that APPS should meet separately from other 
IETF WG's.


 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting LLC
8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110
St. Louis, MO 63119
Voice 314.918.9020
eFAX Fax to EMail 815.333.1237 (Preferred for Fax)
INTERNET Mail & IFAX : rshockey@ix.netcom.com
GSTN Fax 314.918.9015
MediaGate iPost VoiceMail and Fax 800.260.4464
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Received on Tuesday, 7 December 1999 16:33:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 23 March 2006 20:11:26 GMT