Yes, that would be a reasonable optimization. Currently, that would require two round-trips ... one to retrieve the version with that label, and another to do the MERGE. Cheers, Geoff Werner wrote on 11/20/2006 05:57:35 AM: > RFC 3253 says that if the merge source identifies a VCR, the checked-in > version of that VCR is the merge source. This doesn't seem to cover > the classical case where a labeled version in one branch is merged into > another branch. Allowing the Label header in the MERGE method could > solve this. This way the request URI and the merge source could be the > same VCR, where the version with the label is the merge source.Received on Monday, 20 November 2006 14:53:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:44 GMT