W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: The version-tree report for version history resources

From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:46:14 -0400
To: werner.donne@re.be
Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org, ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF15F27DF0.78245A7E-ON852571DB.00405BE9-852571DB.0040A5D0@us.ibm.com>
Note: A better answer (:-) would have been:

If your server supports the version-history feature, then the version-tree 
report is unnecessary, since you can do a DAV:expand-property report on 
the DAV:version-set.



Yes, that would be very reasonable, but note that in practice it is much 
more likely for the client to have in hand a URL for a VCR or a Version, 
on which a version-tree report is defined.

Werner wrote on 08/31/2006 05:54:58 AM:
> Shouldn't the version-tree report also apply to version
> history resources when the version-history feature is
> supported? It seems like the most obvious resource to
> ask it to.
Received on Thursday, 31 August 2006 11:46:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:49 UTC