Re: The version-tree report for version history resources

Note: A better answer (:-) would have been:

If your server supports the version-history feature, then the version-tree 
report is unnecessary, since you can do a DAV:expand-property report on 
the DAV:version-set.

Cheers,
Geoff

--------------

Yes, that would be very reasonable, but note that in practice it is much 
more likely for the client to have in hand a URL for a VCR or a Version, 
on which a version-tree report is defined.


Werner wrote on 08/31/2006 05:54:58 AM:
> Shouldn't the version-tree report also apply to version
> history resources when the version-history feature is
> supported? It seems like the most obvious resource to
> ask it to.