W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: DAV:unreserved - missing precondition?

From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:22:50 -0500
Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFF81A381F.A96865D6-ON85256E59.0075224C-85256E59.007572D5@us.ibm.com>

Either interpretation is OK with me.  Do you (or anyone else) want
this to be added?

Cheers,
Geoff

Alison wrote on 03/12/2004 01:04:43 PM:

> Section 13.3.1 of the spec says:
> 
> > 13.3.1 DAV:unreserved
> > This property of a checked-out resource indicates whether the 
> > DAV:activity-set of another checked-out resource associated with the 
> > version history of this version-controlled resource can have an 
> > activity that is in the DAV:activity-set property of this checked-out 
> > resource.
> 
> The activity feature adds a checkout precondition:
> 
> > (DAV:one-checkout-per-activity-per-history): If there is a request 
> > activity set, unless DAV:unreserved is specified, another checkout 
> > from a version of that version history MUST NOT select an activity in 
> > that activity set.
> 
> Should this precondition also cover the case where the checkout request 
> includes an activity and specifies DAV:unreserved, but the checkout 
> should fail because a checked-out resource already exists, with 
> DAV:unreserved false, and a DAV:activity-set value that contains the 
> checkout request activity?
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2004 16:23:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:15:09 UTC