W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: Allowing DAV:error in any 4xx or 5xx response

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:47:29 +0100
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, "DeltaV \(E-mail\)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCEEAKGJAA.julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>

No (I don't object).

Actually, this (raising this issue here) was on my list of things to do
anyway :-)

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 3:38 PM
> To: DeltaV (E-mail)
> Subject: Allowing DAV:error in any 4xx or 5xx response
>
>
>
> In a recent thread on the ordering protocol, Julian suggested that a
> 500 response code is more appropriate than either a 403 or a 409 for a
> postcondition failure.  I agree, and furthermore believe that RFC3253
> should be updated to allow a DAV:error node to appear in the body of
> any 4xx or 5xx response.  This allows the server to use the most
> meaningful response code for clients that do not understand DAV:error
> nodes.
>
> Does anyone object to this extension?
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
>
>
Received on Monday, 24 February 2003 09:48:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:44 GMT