W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: Marshalling Depth > 0 responses for REPORTs, WAS: Replacing t he Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:15:28 +0200
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCMEHGFCAA.julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>

> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 12:05 AM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Marshalling Depth > 0 responses for REPORTs, WAS: Replacing
> t he Label header with a DAV:labeled-version report
>
>
>
> The DAV:locate-by-history report finds any collection member
> for that history, not just internal members.  In particular,
> the example in 5.4.1 shows a Depth:0 (the default) request which
> finds the /ws/public/x/test.html member of the /ws/public collection.

OK, agreed.

Somehow, I wasn't paying attention to the distinction between "collection
member" and "internal collection member".

> So a DAV:locate-by-history report only makes sense with the
> default Depth header value of "0".

Yes.

> What report are you thinking of that makes sense with a non-zero
> depth, but which can only be applied to collections?

None (anymore), currently.
Received on Friday, 16 August 2002 03:16:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:43 GMT