W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: comment vs auto-versioning

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:53:43 -0500
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B105E4DA74@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
It's up to the server, but I'd probably go with (3), as it probably
provides the most value.


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:52 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: DAV:comment vs auto-versioning


what's the best treatment for DAV:comment when a resource get's checked in
due to auto-versioning?

1) no special treatment (old value),

2) remote it (set it to empty string),

3) generate a server-specific comment ("checked in due to auto versioning

Received on Saturday, 23 February 2002 18:54:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:48 UTC