RE: comment vs auto-versioning

It's up to the server, but I'd probably go with (3), as it probably
provides the most value.

Cheers,
Geoff


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 12:52 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: DAV:comment vs auto-versioning


Hi,

what's the best treatment for DAV:comment when a resource get's checked in
due to auto-versioning?

1) no special treatment (old value),

2) remote it (set it to empty string),

3) generate a server-specific comment ("checked in due to auto versioning
on...")?

Julian