W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: version-tree REPORT on non-version-controlled resource

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 18:47:06 +0100
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKENEDNAA.julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
OK,

this make sense.

The spec could be a bit clearer, though :-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:43 PM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: RE: version-tree REPORT on non-version-controlled resource
> 
> 
> No, not "400:Conflict.
> 
> Either "409: Conflict" if the resource could be put under version control,
> or "403: Forbidden" if the resource cannot be put under version control.
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:30 AM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: DAV:version-tree REPORT on non-version-controlled resource
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> what would be the expected response code for a DAV:version-tree 
> report on a
> resource which is not version controlled? Bad Request?
> 
> Julian
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 12:47:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:43 GMT