W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2002


From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 14:14:14 -0500
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B103F8AE74@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
   From: Konstantin Knizhnik [mailto:KKnizhnik@togetherlab.com]

   If server doesn't support workspaces (or server supports workspaces
   but client is not using this feature), is there any chance to get
   version controlled resource for the given version or version

The DAV:locate-by-history report is part of the version-history
feature, not part of the workspace feature, so any server that
supports version histories should support this report.

   Suppose the following scenario:

   MKDIR MyProject
   PUT MyProject/foo.txt

   So now version controlled resource, version history and initial version
   are created for all resources in MyProject.

Note that this VERSION-CONTROL request will only place the collection
"MyProject" under version control.  It does *not* place any of the 
members of MyProject under version control (VERSION-CONTROL is not
a depth operation).

You would have to explicitly apply VERSION-CONTROL to each member of
MyProject that you wanted to be under version control (unless of course
your server puts every resource under version control, in which case
no VERSION-CONTROL request is required for MyProject or any other

   Now I set the label to the project:

   LABEL MyProject
   Depth: Infinite
   <DAV:label xmlns:DAV="DAV:">

   Later I want to extract this state of the project. Certainly I know
   that BASELINE is write way for doing it,


   1. What if server doesn't support baselines (labels belong to the
   basic versioning stuff, while baselines belong to advanced)?

Just to avoid any misunderstanding, the label feature is only
part of the basic-client-workspace package, not part of all basic
versioning packages, so in general a client cannot count on the presence of
the label feature from a basic versioning server.

(A server can of course decide to support both the basic-server-workspace
package and the label feature, but a client should not expect this).

   2. Once labels are defined by specification, it should be clear how to
   use them, right?

Yes, but you shouldn't expect to be able to do with labels what
you can with baselines (i.e. if you need baseline functionality,
you should get it from the server, not try to fake it with labels).

   So I do:

   PROPFIND MyProject
   depth: Infinite
   <DAV:propfind xmlns:DAV="DAV:">

I assume you meant to have a "Label ALPHA-RELEASE" header in the

   So I will be given information about all versions in MyProject labeled
   by "ALHPA-RELEASE". Is is ok, but now I want to extract this files to
   the client's local disk. In here is a trouble - I don't know path of
   the resources. In report I will be given:


Yes, that is correct.

   How the client will understand that foo.txt should be saved in the
   file \MyProject\foo.txt at local disk?

You should also have asked for the DAV:version-history property, and
then you can use a single DAV:locate-by-history report to find the pathname
to the VCRs for those histories in the MyProject collection.

This is of course trivial when a server supports baselines.  The Label
mechanism is mostly useful for doing things one resource at a time.

   The only way is to find out version controlled resource for the
   givven version (or version history).  Report locate-by-history
   requires workspace as request target. But client knows nothing
   about workspaces and my be that are not even supported by server.
   So what should I do?

The simple answer is to only provide this functionality for servers
that support baselines.  It's good to interoperate with any server,
but trying to "fake" missing server functionality (e.g. faking
baselines with labels) will result in a complex (and often inefficient)
client.  But you can use the DAV:locate-by-history report if you
really want to do this.

   If version history will be specified as target of LOCATE-BY-HISTORY
   and workspace can be optionally specified in request body, then
   this report can be used to get versioned resource even if server
   doesn't support workspaces or it support workspaces and when workspace
   is not explicitly specified by client, then resource is implicitly
   placed in some default workspace.

The request-URL for the DAV:locate-by-history identifies any collection
(i.e. it doesn't have to be a workspace).  The version-historys are
specified in the request body to allow you to ask for several in
one request.

   But even in this case getting resource name require two additional
   requests: PROPFIND to get version history by version and
   locate-by-history REPORT to give versioned resource reference.

   Another way is to add property <DAV:defaultdisplacepath/> with the
   following semantic:
   - for version controlled resource, it returns its URL
   - for version and version history - URL of version controlled resource
     in default workspace if such exists

There is no concept of a "default workspace", so there is no
particular path that could be displayed here.  It is unlikely that we
would add a new concept like "default workspace" just to allow one
feature (i.e. labels) to better simulate another existing feature
(i.e. baselines).

Received on Thursday, 10 January 2002 14:15:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:48 UTC