W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: activity-set and new members of a working collection

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:33:25 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B1074A5D0B@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org

Yes, I agree that this would make sense.


-----Original Message-----
From: B H, Girish [mailto:g.b.h@sap.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:09 AM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: activity-set and new members of a working collection

A working-collection can have non-versioned-resources as its members. And
when the working-collection is checked in, these non-versioned-members are
automatically version-controlled.

If the working-collection has a non-empty DAV:activity-set, then would it
not make sense to copy this activity-set to each of the
non-versioned-members which have been automatically version-controlled? This
is especially meaningful when we consider the activity as a 'change set'.
Surely the newly added resources are part of the same 'logical change' as
their parent collection.

Received on Thursday, 27 June 2002 10:33:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:48 UTC