W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: Label header vs PROPFIND depth 1

From: Tim Ellison <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:56:53 +0100
To: "Deltav WG" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF869CC41A.8C26886A-ON80256BA3.0056745E@portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>

"Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> wrote:

> > What do you mean by the _variants_ of a version-controlled resource?
> > understanding is that a variant is an alternate representation of a
> > resource, and that is not the case here.
> Yes, it is.

...oh no it isn't   [[ a British vaudeville joke, that probably looses a
lot in translation<g> ]]

> The label header is a variant selector as defined per RFC2616. If this
> wouldn't be the case, including "label" in the "vary" header would be

Well I've read the definition of a variant, and a version is certainly not
a variant of a version-controlled resource.   And I've read the definition
of the vary: header and it talks about the cache-ability of the result.
What am I missing?

If DeltaV implies that a version is a variant of a version-controlled
resource then that must be fixed.

Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 12:02:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:48 UTC