W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > April to June 2002

RE: Creation time of a version.

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 15:26:08 +0200
To: <tim@ellison.name>, "Deltav WG" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKENMEGAA.julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Tim Ellison
> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:13 PM
> To: Deltav WG
> Subject: RE: Creation time of a version.
> ..
>
> > Wouldn't that always be identical to DAV:getlastmodified?
> >
>
> Depends on your interpretation of last modified (namely whether
> it includes
> property value modifications).  A version's (live) properties may be
> modified, so the timestamps may differ.

Good point.

So from Edgar's point of view, DAV:creationdate would make more sense. Alas,
can a client rely on that?
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 09:26:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:43 GMT