- From: Roy Seto <Roy.Seto@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:22:14 -0700
- To: <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
By inference from Section 3.10, it looks like DAV:cannot-modify-version-controlled-property should be reported when the request-URL identifies a resource with a DAV:checked-in property, and DAV:cannot-modify-version should be reported when the request-URL identifies a version resource. Roy -----Original Message----- From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Julian Reschke Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 AM To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org Subject: RE: Meaning of precondition DAV:supported-live-property Speaking of PROPPATCH preconditions, I can't help noticing that (DAV:cannot-modify-version-controlled-property): If the request attempts to modify a dead property, same semantics as PUT (see Section 3.10). (DAV:cannot-modify-version): If the request attempts to modify a dead property, same semantics as PUT (see Section 3.10). are identical. Which one should be reported?
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2002 17:21:46 UTC