W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re (2): Re[2]: baselines & namespaces

From: <Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:41:04 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <200112221141.fBMBf4Q23070@sophia.inria.fr>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Cc: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de
"Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com> wrote:
>    From: Konstantin Knizhnik [mailto:KKnizhnik@togetherlab.com]
> 
>    Consider the following situation: we have
>    version-controlled-directory /x placed under baseline control and
>    version-controlled-directory /x/y belonging to the different
>    configuration. Now if we extract baseline (without subbaselines)
>    from version-controlled-configuration for /x in some workspace, how
>    we should handle /x/y belonging to the other configuration and all
>    it's members ?
> 
> To make this more concrete: let's assume that "some workspace" is
> /ws/kk, and that /ws/kk/x is under baseline control, and
> version-controlled configuration associated with /ws/kk/x selects a
> baseline from the baseline history /repo/bh/8.  Now a new baseline
> (/repo/bl/22) for /repo/bh/8 is created in some other workspace, and
> we decide to MERGE /repo/bl/22 into /ws/kk.
> 
>    Should created version-controlled-resource /x contain binding to "y"?
> 
> Yes.  Although it is not a binding "to" y, but rather a binding "named" y.
Hi Geoff, my interpretation of Konstantins question is different.
If /x/y is the root collection of another configuration it doesn't belong to /x
and if it also isn't a subbaseline of /x it must not be created when /x is
extracted in a new workspace.
Just as a reminder: In my understanding the BASELINE-CONTROL feature can
exist without the VERSION-CONTROLLED-COLLECTION feature.

Cheers, Edgar


-- 
edgar@edgarschwarz.de                    http://www.edgarschwarz.de
*          DOSenfreie Zone.        Running Active Oberon.         *
Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler.     Albert Einstein
Received on Sunday, 23 December 2001 07:34:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:43 GMT