- From: Kirmse, Daniel <daniel.kirmse@sap.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:07:08 +0100
- To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning (E-mail)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
><<snip>> > >> 2. What about creating "components"/subbaselines/subconfigurations. >> Because of the definition of a Configuration given in DeltaV >> one would assume that the components have to be created before >> the "component container" otherwise there would be a problem with >> the definition: >> >> A "configuration" is a set of resources that consists of a root >> collection and all members (not just internal members) of that >> root collection that are not members of another configuration. > >Agreed. > >> But in my opinion the "component" baselines/configurations created >> that way would be no subbaselines. Or would they be? > >Yes. Furthermore, the subbaselines are not constrained to >capture parts >of the namespace rooted by C, they can be disjoint. > This means you could have a baseline /.../B/C/... rooted at /.../B/C Possible subbaselines could be: /.../B/C/A/... rooted at /.../B/C/A or /.../B/... rooted at /.../B or even /.../D/E/... rooted at /.../D/E right? ><<snip>>
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2001 11:07:46 UTC