W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: Some questions on Configurations

From: Kirmse, Daniel <daniel.kirmse@sap.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 17:07:08 +0100
Message-ID: <59357A260E15D311B5A60008C75D3530068B4726@dbwdfx13.wdf.sap-ag.de>
To: "Ietf-Dav-Versioning (E-mail)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
><<snip>>
>
>> 2. What about creating "components"/subbaselines/subconfigurations.
>> Because of the definition of a Configuration given in DeltaV
>> one would assume that the components have to be created before
>> the "component container" otherwise there would be a problem with
>> the definition:
>> 
>>    A "configuration" is a set of resources that consists of a root
>>    collection and all members (not just internal members) of that
>>    root collection that are not members of another configuration.
>
>Agreed.
>
>> But in my opinion the "component" baselines/configurations created
>> that way would be no subbaselines. Or would they be?
>
>Yes.  Furthermore, the subbaselines are not constrained to 
>capture parts 
>of the namespace rooted by C, they can be disjoint.
>

This means you could have a baseline /.../B/C/... rooted at /.../B/C
Possible subbaselines could be:  /.../B/C/A/... rooted at /.../B/C/A
or /.../B/... rooted at /.../B
or even /.../D/E/... rooted at /.../D/E

right?

><<snip>>
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2001 11:07:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:43 GMT