W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: Clarification on definition of a configuration....

From: Peter Raymond <Peter.Raymond@merant.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 13:22:46 +0100
Message-ID: <20CF1CE11441D411919C0008C7C5A13B02AD3001@stalmail.eu.merant.com>
To: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>, "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Hi,

Greg's description seems to be clearer, I like it.

Regards,
--
Peter Raymond - MERANT
Principal Architect (PVCS)
Tel: +44 (0)1727 813362
Fax: +44 (0)1727 869804
mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com
WWW: http://www.merant.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org]
Sent: 01 October 2001 12:28
To: Clemm, Geoff
Cc: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: Re: Clarification on definition of a configuration....


On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 08:59:48AM -0400, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
> 
>    From: Peter Raymond [mailto:Peter.Raymond@merant.com]
> 
>    The statement in section 12 says: 
> 
>       "A configuration is a set of resources that consists of a root
>       collection and all members of that root collection that are not
>       members of another configuration."
>...
> What in the definition led you to this conclusion?  (This is a real
> question, not a rhetorical question, because if something in the text
> led you to this conclusion, it should be fixed).

Maybe change to:

       "A configuration is a set of resources that consists of a root
       collection and all members of that root collection except those
       resources which are members of another configuration."

IMO, that is a bit clearer that the resources *can* be in another
configuration, and that they are excluded from the parent collection.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Monday, 1 October 2001 08:25:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:42 GMT