W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: extending method request/response bodies

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 23:23:34 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B1042AAF50@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Yes, as long as the extension elements can safely be ignored by servers
and clients that don't understand them (this is a WebDAV requirement,
not a DeltaV requirement).


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian F. Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 7:22 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: extending method request/response bodies


just a check:

is it ok to put "arbitrary" extension elements into deltaV request/response
bodies, as long as they don't live in the DAV: namespace?

Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2001 23:13:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:47 UTC