W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > July to September 2001

Re: MERGE & UPDATE responses

From: Jim Amsden <jamsden@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:26:27 -0400
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFA1FBB8DC.1FE81376-ON85256AAF.0080379B@raleigh.ibm.com>
Tim,
Good suggestion. I agree.





"Tim Ellison" <tim@peir.com>
Sent by: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
08/21/2001 05:25 PM

 
        To:     "DeltaV" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        MERGE & UPDATE responses

 

In an attempt to unify the responses from MERGE and UPDATE, and to address
the concerns some have expressed for parsing the responses of these 
methods,
I propose that:
(a) the DAV:ignore-set is dropped from the responses.  What would you do
with them anyway?  Speak up if you have a use-case that requires these; 
and,
(b) the response marshalling should be in the Multi-Status format so that
implementations can reuse their existing code.  I think the responses will
fit well in this format.

Note that (a) will simplify the protocol, and (b) will simplify the
implementation without changing the semantics of the operations.  They are
relatively minor changes.

Regards,
Tim
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2001 19:27:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:42 GMT