W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: IETF-51 DeltaV WG meeting minutes

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:52:33 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B103F8AB4C@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
   From: Tim Ellison [mailto:Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com]

   Peter Raymond <Peter.Raymond@merant.com> wrote:

   > I guess I am not sure when it's best to have empty properties, versus
   > removing the property (pros and cons of both).  But one thing I do know
   > is that it would be good if we were consistent in the spec.

   I think it is sufficient for the spec to state what it means when the
   property includes a given value, without having to distinguish between
   missing and empty properties.  However, to make the document readable and
   unambiguous I support the (purely editorial) change to refer to the
   properties being removed.

I agree.

   > Can you remember if there was some reason why we said the property
   > would be empty as opposed to being removed?

   I don't think that there is any distinction to be made.

I agree.

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 17:44:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:47 UTC