- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:52:33 -0400
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com] Peter Raymond <Peter.Raymond@merant.com> wrote: > I guess I am not sure when it's best to have empty properties, versus > removing the property (pros and cons of both). But one thing I do know > is that it would be good if we were consistent in the spec. I think it is sufficient for the spec to state what it means when the property includes a given value, without having to distinguish between missing and empty properties. However, to make the document readable and unambiguous I support the (purely editorial) change to refer to the properties being removed. I agree. > Can you remember if there was some reason why we said the property > would be empty as opposed to being removed? I don't think that there is any distinction to be made. I agree. Cheers, Geoff
Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 17:44:10 UTC