W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: Issues/questions regarding sections 3, 4 and 5...

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:47:10 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B1018E2587@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
   From: Tim Ellison [mailto:Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com]

   > Section 5.4.1 since this report is on a collection I would
   > like a Depth header defined.
   > Again I think we should be consistent (to avoid speical-case
   > coding). Any method that gets properties of a collection
   > should take a Depth header.

   All REPORTs may take a Depth: header (see versioning-16 Sec. 3.6)

Yes, but I think Peter's point was that the Depth header is
missing in the example.  It is in fact missing ... I've added
it.  Thanks for noticing!

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2001 14:41:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:47 UTC