W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: Use of attributes

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:53:15 -0700
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, "DeltaV" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <HPELJFCBPHIPBEJDHKGKGEDBCLAA.lisa@xythos.com>
Shouldn't that be the <D:prop> element -- already used in PROPFIND response
and PROPPATCH request bodies -- rather than the <D:name> element?

lisa

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 1:50 PM
> To: DeltaV
> Subject: RE: Use of attributes
>
>
>
>    From: Julian F. Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de]
>
>    > From: Clemm, Geoff
>    >
>    > Probably, the best way to go is to replace the old syntax, i.e.:
>    >
>    >   <D:supported-live-property-set>
>    >     <D:supported-live-property>
>    >       <D:name> <D:getcontentlanguage/> </D:name>
>    >     </D:supported-live-property>
>    >     <D:supported-live-property>
>    >       <D:name> <X:quota/> </D:name>
>    >   </supported-live-property-set>
>
>    Why do we need <D:name>? Wouldn't
>
>    <D:supported-live-property-set>
> 	<D:supported-live-property>
> 	   <D:getcontentlanguage/>
> 	</D:supported-live-property>
> 	<D:supported-live-property>
> 	   <X:quota/>
> 	</D:supported-live-property>
>    </D:supported-live-property-set>
>
> This would make it unsafe to define extensions to the
> D:supported-live-property content, because you would risk
> colliding with the name of a live property.  The D:name
> intermediate node ensures that there is no such collision.
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
Received on Tuesday, 14 August 2001 13:53:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:42 GMT