W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: DTD Confusion (i.e., opportunity)

From: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 16:38:22 +0000
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <802569EE.005B6B1B.00@d06mta07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>


I agree, it makes an excellent candidate for another appendix.

Tim


"Jim Amsden" <jamsden@us.ibm.com> on 2001-02-09 04:07:52 PM

Please respond to "Jim Amsden" <jamsden@us.ibm.com>

To:   ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
cc:
Subject:  Re: DTD Confusion (i.e., opportunity)




I think having the DTDs is great (XML Schema even better), and they should
be included in the document along with the notes that Jim W made about
WebDAV conventions. I used the WebDAV DTDs a lot when developing DAV4J to
define the objects being passed between the client and server. However, I
still don't think they should be in any way required by the protocol for
sending or receiving requests. So I encourage anyone interested to
contribute to this valuable effort, and would be happy to consider
including DTDs in the DeltaV spec as long as 1) they don't introduce
unnecessary issues, and 2) we don't hold up the spec for the details. This
is probably a refinement that can be applied after proposed draft.
Received on Friday, 9 February 2001 11:39:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:40 GMT