W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: Submitting DeltaV as Informational RFC? (was: Split ting off core: where we stand)

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 09:37:46 -0500
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B101FC03DF@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
That is exactly the point that Greg and I were trying to make.
Many of us *require* a standards track document in order to make the
investment necessary to develop an interoperable implementation.


-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Reuter [mailto:reuter@ira.uka.de]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 8:43 AM
To: Greg Stein
Cc: reuter@ira.uka.de; ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: Re: Submitting DeltaV as Informational RFC? (was: Splitting off
core: where we stand)

> Agh... no way. This *is* a standards track document. Nothing less.

According to RFC 2026, section 4.2, an Informational RFC is *not* on
the standards track.

Received on Friday, 9 February 2001 09:29:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:46 UTC