Hello, I won't teleconference but nevertheless I think the options dependency diagram is a good idea because in practice options aren't independant. Probably it's just not possible to define all options orthogonal. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards Edgar Schwarz -- Edgar.Schwarz@marconi.com, Postf. 1920, D-71509 Backnang,+49 7191 13 3382, Marconi Communications, Access Division, Quality and Process Improvement Privat kann jeder soviel C programmieren oder Videos ansehen wie er mag (Niklaus Wirth). Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler (A.Einstein) |--------+-----------------------> | | "Clemm, | | | Geoff" | | | <gclemm@ratio| | | nal.com> | | | | | | 09.02.2001 | | | 01:04 | | | | |--------+-----------------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | An: "'ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org'" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org> | | Kopie: (Blindkopie: Edgar Schwarz/MAIN/MC1) | | Thema: Versioning TeleConf Agenda, 2/9/00 (Friday) 12-1pm EST | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------| phone: 888 819 8909 pass-code#97985 Agenda: Is the 12.2 version of the draft ready for submission to the IESG? (Note: I have two pending changes, namely Juergen's option dependency diagram, and Greg's word change for section 11.3). Cheers, GeoffReceived on Friday, 9 February 2001 03:08:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:40 GMT