W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2001

RE: errors in 9.8 and 9.9

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 08:15:27 -0500
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B101EAEC93@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
But a label header is not allowed with an UPDATE request
(it wouldn't make sense, because an UPDATE request must 
be applied to a version-controlled resource, and a Label
header applies a request to a version).

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 8:02 AM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: Re: errors in 9.8 and 9.9


Same text, but refer to the DAV:version element instead (within the text,
and for the precondition name)

Cheers,
-g

On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 07:31:45AM -0500, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
> Thanks for finding that, Greg!  Yes, it was supposed to go in the
> CHECKOUT preconditions, not the UPDATE preconditions.
> 
> What did you have in mind for a new precondition for 9.9 (UPDATE)?
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 5:36 AM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: errors in 9.8 and 9.9
> 
> 
> The first precondition in 9.9 refers to DAV:apply-to-version. The UPDATE
> method can have a DAV:version element. DAV:apply-to-version is used in
> CHECKOUT. The name of the precondition would change, too.
> 
> However, this precondition *does* apply to section 9.8 (CHECKOUT) (where
it
> is missing). Basically, move the precondition in 9.9 up to 9.8, and then
> write a new one for 9.9.
> 
> Cheers,
> -g
> 
> -- 
> Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2001 08:07:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:40 GMT