W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Comments on -12: properties, REPORT, OPTIONS

From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 22:55:35 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200102050355.WAA20109@tantalum.atria.com>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org

   From: "Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>

   > > 4) What are the semantics if there is an XML request body
   > > for OPTIONS, and this request body does not include a
   > > DAV:supported-method-set, DAV:supported-live-property-set,
   > > or DAV:supported-report-set at all (i.e., what happens if
   > > one or more are just plain omitted)?
   > Then the corresponding response elements are 'just plain omitted'.

   That makes sense, but it should be specified.  Another perfectly
   reasonable response is to flag the input as a syntax error, since
   it's missing an expected XML element, and this could cause
   interoperability problems.

Now that these are back to being properties, the question no longer

Received on Sunday, 4 February 2001 22:56:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:46 UTC