W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re (2): Labels and Status

From: <Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 17:20:37 -0500
Message-Id: <200102032220.RAA29603@tux.w3.org>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Cc: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de
"Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com> wrote:
> Yes, many versioning systems have "status" properties on versions, and
> the "status" property should be mutable, i.e. should be writable without
> creating a new version.
snip
> Thus, versioning needs a general way to allow creation of custom
> properties which are mutable, AND custom properties which are immutable.
> The server would of course reject requests for mutable properties if it
> does not support mutability, but we need a standard way for clients to
> ask for this.
I saw no reply to that yet so I will give my $0.02.
I think a mutable status property is essential if I want to do some
document management.
To be more flexible I also would want to to have at least arbitrary
mutable properties to add to a version.
Or can I mimic that by adding multiple labels to a version ? E.g.
doc#1 status_accepted, author_edgar
doc#2 status_working, author_lisa (sometimes authors of documents change)

Cheers, Edgar


-- 
edgar@edgarschwarz.de                    http://www.edgarschwarz.de
*          DOSenfreie Zone.        Running Native Oberon.         *
Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler.     Albert Einstein
Received on Saturday, 3 February 2001 17:20:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:40 GMT