<tim> 2.9 Additional DELETE semantics (DAV:update-predecessor-set) I presume this is to prevent "holes" in the history, but this won't work in the face of merges. </tim> <geoff/>Why not? Now I've thought about it again, I retract this one. TimReceived on Friday, 19 January 2001 04:56:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:40 GMT