W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: DeltaV Draft

From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 22:20:17 -0800
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <20010114222017.A6081@lyra.org>
I've posted info about Subversion already, and it will appear at some point
on the DeltaV site (when somebody gets a Round Tuit). SVN will implement
quite of few of the optional features (working resources, version history,
collection versions, baselines, activities, fork control, and labeling).


On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 11:18:03PM -0500, Jim Amsden wrote:
> Preston,
> You are absolutely correct. Luckily, there are at least four 
> implementations of WebDAV DeltaV in progress that I am aware of. But I'll 
> let their developers share any appropriate information.
> Jim Amsden
> 919-543-3511
> [snip]
> > We've already got a complex spec, so I try to leave out anything
> > that doesn't directly contribute to interoperability.
> The part about a complex spec is beginning to bother me :).
> Is there anything like a reference implementation?
> The traffic in this list reminds me of any number of design
> discussions in which I've been in the past.  Each participant
> has an internal model of how the product (once built) may
> function, and everyone's internal model is different.
> Once implementations exist you discover where your internal
> models differ.  You also discover which bits are important, 
> omitted, or downright boneheaded.
> I'm guessing there are people doing implementations, though
> given the rate of change in the specification doubtless
> no one is current with the spec. 
> So where is the sanity check?
> --
> Preston L. Bannister
> preston@home.com
> http://members.home.com/preston/ 

Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Monday, 15 January 2001 01:20:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:46 UTC