- From: Preston L. Bannister <preston@home.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 14:07:42 -0800
- To: <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
[snip] > We've already got a complex spec, so I try to leave out anything > that doesn't directly contribute to interoperability. The part about a complex spec is beginning to bother me :). Is there anything like a reference implementation? The traffic in this list reminds me of any number of design discussions in which I've been in the past. Each participant has an internal model of how the product (once built) may function, and everyone's internal model is different. Once implementations exist you discover where your internal models differ. You also discover which bits are important, omitted, or downright boneheaded. I'm guessing there are people doing implementations, though given the rate of change in the specification doubtless no one is current with the spec. So where is the sanity check? -- Preston L. Bannister preston@home.com http://members.home.com/preston/
Received on Saturday, 13 January 2001 17:07:44 UTC