W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Re (2): Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:48:16 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B1018E24C9@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
You can't really make an analogue between RCS commands 
and version-controlled resources, because RCS does not
provide the concept of a version-controlled resource
(it has version history resources - the ,v files, and it
has workspaces).


-----Original Message-----
From: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de [mailto:Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:43 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Cc: Edgar@EdgarSchwarz.de
Subject: Re (2): Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal

johnhall@evergo.net wrote:
> In my system I have no problem tracking moves, but it isn't my
> objective.  My objective is having a CHECKIN of the working resource
> update the VCR.  That isn't a 'gee it would be nice to have' request.
> It is far more important to me than that.  Lack of such a feature would
> be quite painful.
I guess you want the feature you get in RCS with 'ci -u <filename>'.
If that's basically what you want then I wholeheartedly agree. That's
at least my default usecase while creating new versions. I just hope I
miss something :-)

Cheers, Edgar

edgar@edgarschwarz.de                    http://www.edgarschwarz.de
*          DOSenfreie Zone.        Running Active Oberon.         *
Make it as simple as possible, but not simpler.     Albert Einstein
Received on Friday, 22 June 2001 14:42:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:47 UTC