RE: Last Call for DAV:checked-out-vcr Proposal

"John Hall" <johnhall@evergo.net> wrote:
> Note that my use case is different from the one Geoff
> stated.

Well lets ensure that we are solving the problem.

> I don't want to support UPDATE or MERGE.  Just CHECKOUT
> (the VCR to a working copy) and CHECKIN (working copy to
> update the VCR).

... and you don't want in-place-checkout semantics?  even with locks? but
you do want to track moves to the version-controlled resource while you are
updating it in the working resource?

Tim