W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT?

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:23:50 -0700
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <HPELJFCBPHIPBEJDHKGKAECJCHAA.lisa@xythos.com>
I would like to see this pointed out explicitly in the spec (does not need
to be normative though), rather than have the behaviour left to be induced.

lisa

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:51 PM
> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT?
>
>
> The versioning protocol places no restriction on who can
> do an UNCHECKOUT (if there were, you would see it specified
> as a precondition for the UNCHECKOUT method).
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hall [mailto:johnhall@evergo.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 5:24 PM
> To: 'Clemm, Geoff'; ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
> Subject: Should CHECKOUT support a TIMEOUT?
>
>
>
> ... And if not, is there a provision for someone other than the person
> who did the checkout performing an UNCHECKOUT?
>
>
Received on Saturday, 16 June 2001 12:25:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:41 GMT