W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:bas eline resource type values

From: Julian F. Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:23:59 +0200
To: "DeltaV \(E-mail\)" <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCIEHBCGAA.julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
OK,

where's the best place to compile a list of known bug in Microsoft's
webfolders?

Julian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
> [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Stefan Eissing
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:01 AM
> To: DeltaV (E-mail)
> Subject: AW: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and
> DAV:bas eline resource type values
>
>
> > [mailto:ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org]Im Auftrag von Clemm, Geoff
> >
> > Yes, that is what has been reported.
> >
> > Although if I am wrong about the lack of support for lock-null
> > resources, maybe I'm wrong about this too ... I hope not!
> > (I don't suppose two wrongs make a right in this case? :-)
>
> MS Webfolders display a folder icon for resources where the
> resourcetype is non-empty. Just tested.
>
> > Cheers,
> > Geoff
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Julian F. Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@greenbytes.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 5:57 PM
> > To: Clemm, Geoff; DeltaV (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and
> > DAV:bas eline resource type values
> >
> >
> > could you expand a bit on what the bug is? Are they treating
> > anything with a
> > non-empty resourcetype as collection?
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2001 05:24:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:41 GMT