RE: Removing the DAV:activity and DAV:version-history and DAV:baseline resource type values

>
> Therefore, I recommend that the DeltaV specification *keep* the
> DAV:activity, DAV:version-history, and DAV:baseline resourcetype values.

What about "version-controlled-resource", "version" and "workspace"?

It would also be nice to identify a version-controlled collection in some
way that it's also recognizable as a collection (e.g.

<DAV:resourcetype><DAV:collection/><DAV:version-controlled-collection/></DAV
:resourcetype>

lisa

Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2001 19:54:38 UTC