RE: PROPFIND allprop with more properties (was AW: Resource class )

> Maybe you should go back to the proposal. We have suggested adding an
...
>
> So do I. Please check what we proposed -- you were quoting from Geoff's
> example, not ours.
>
> We are currently doing it this way (with "include" in our own namespace):
>
> <propfind xmlns="DAV:">
>   <allprop/>
>   <include>
>     <checked-in/><checked-out/><version-name/>
>   </include>
> </propfind>
>
Sorry, you're right, I got confused after a few replies and was criticizing
Geoff's example, not yours.

Your example has good backward-compatibility, as did mine.

lisa