W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Table for autoversioning

From: Jim Whitehead <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:55:34 -0700
To: "Fay, Chuck" <CFay@filenet.com>, <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AMEPKEBLDJJCCDEJHAMIAEBNCNAA.ejw@cse.ucsc.edu>
Hmm, I hadn't realized we were moving towards new terminology for
autoversioning.  I've checked out the -15 draft, and I think the new
autoversioning terminology is a step in the right direction.  I'd still like
to see the requirements listed in a tabular form.

Chuck Fay wrote:
>  As I noted in my earlier message, I also prefer the old terminology.

- Jim
Received on Friday, 20 April 2001 17:57:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:41 GMT