- From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:32:01 -0700
- To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 09:24:19AM -0700, Jim Whitehead wrote: >... > To resolve this issue, DeltaV needs to either: > > (a) Develop a plausible explanation for why label information is not human > readable text. > > (b) Explain why label text, unlike all other human readable text, does not > require language tagging. > > (c) Add a language tag to the label. > > In my opinion, choices (a) and (b) are high-risk, since they have a higher > probability of causing the DeltaV draft to be sent back to the working group > to resolve the i18n issues associated with labels. Choice (c) is low-risk, > since it meets the letter and spirit of RFC 2277. Fair enough. Rather than nuke the header, I propose that we take advantage of the standard format for headers: Label: name; language="en-us" Note that RFC 2616, S3.10 talks about how to specify a language value. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Monday, 16 April 2001 17:30:05 UTC