On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:50:36PM -0500, Geoffrey M. Clemm wrote: > > Currently, I still have some stuff to write up for the revised > protocol, but the only thing left on my "unresolved issue" list is: > > (1) Should version history URL's be in core (i.e. be required)? Prefer no. I don't have the mindset for a "core" server, so I'm not sure why this would be needed. [ as Boris pokes fun :-) ... yes, I need it for a REPORT, but that is it. ] > (2) Should version URL's be stable (i.e. cannot later refer to something else)? Yes. > Any other unresolved issues that I've missed? Do you have activity checkin? And the working collection stuff? (although, I believe those are resolved now) Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/Received on Tuesday, 19 December 2000 16:59:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:39 GMT