W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: Minutes Delta-V breakout meeting 14-Dec-00

From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:46:39 -0800
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Message-ID: <20001215144639.D8945@lyra.org>
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:03:50PM +0000, Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com wrote:
> Discussion of defining a DAV:is-branch property on an activity to advise a
> client whether the activity represents a branch or change set.  The
> property would have no impact on the server behaviour.  Alternative
> suggestion was to define a DAV:is-change-set property that would require
> the server to enfore there was only one version per history per activity.
> Howevr, it was noted that this would require a means for setting the
> property when the activity is created (defining a body to initialize
> properties during MKACTIVITY?)

As one of the guys using activities :-), I'm fine with adding the
DAV:is-change-set property, and extending the request body.

> James H. agreed to write up his semantics differences between a chane set
> and a branch (both being sets of resources) and why it would be useful for
> servers to distinguish them.  James to post this to the list.

Sounds great.


Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Received on Friday, 15 December 2000 17:42:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:46 UTC