CHECKIN an activity

>   Just how is a transacted change set supposed to
>    happen, then? Before, it was "accumulate the changes
>    into an activity, then merge the activity." What now?
>
> I'd support the introduction of the ability to CHECKIN
> an activity, to mean "atomically checkin all checked-out
> resources for that activity".  Does anyone object?  (pretty
> sneaky burying this question deep in this long message ...
> :-).

Just to show that people do read these long threads -- I think this is a
fine idea.

Tim