Re: VERSION-CONTROL on an existing resource

From: Geoffrey M. Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@rational.com> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 10:38:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200011181538.KAA17022@tantalum.atria.com> To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:39 GMT

   From: Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org>

   Section 9.1.1 shows the use of a VERSION-CONTROL on an existing resource.
   However, it responds with a 201 (Created). I'm thinking that it should be a
   200 (OK) or a 204 (No Content) since it is not creating the Request-URI.

I agree.  I'd prefer just the 200(OK).  I'll make this change if nobody
objects.

Cheers,
Geoff