W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org > October to December 2000

RE: predecessor-set

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:24:44 -0400
Message-ID: <3906C56A7BD1F54593344C05BD1374B10D9EDF@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
OK, here's everyone's last chance to object, or else the change
will appear in 09.2

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI [mailto:Boris_Bokowski@oti.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 1:28 PM
To: Clemm, Geoff
Subject: RE: predecessor-set


Did anybody object to this? (I expected to see the change in 09.1)

-Boris.





"Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
Sent by: ietf-dav-versioning-request@w3.org
09/28/00 03:56 PM

 
        To:     ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: predecessor-set

That's fine with me.  If nobody objects, I'll make that change.

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Bokowski/OTT/OTI [mailto:Boris_Bokowski@oti.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 1:53 PM
To: ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org
Subject: DAV:predecessor-set


The DAV:predecessor-set on checked out version selectors and working 
resources shows up in advanced versioning, but has nothing to do with 
anything else in advanced. Couldn't it be moved to core-versioning, saying 

that "core versioning servers MAY restrict the DAV:predecessor-set 
property to contain only the version listed in the DAV:checked-out 
property"?

-Boris.
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2000 10:26:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 13:57:39 GMT