Message-Id: <m103Q1P-000OW3C@jazzie.com> From: email@example.com (Sean Shapira) To: firstname.lastname@example.org (Chris Kaler) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:44:06 -0800 (PST) Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, In-Reply-To: <4FD6422BE942D111908D00805F3158DF0A757BE0@RED-MSG-52> from "Chris Kaler" at Jan 21, 99 10:41:26 am Subject: Re: CHECKIN/CHECKOUT - Mutable resources and a call for consensus Chris Kaler wrote: > [CK] I think this is too strong. A way to use a configuration is for > reproducibility, but I don't think that is the only value of a > configuration. I could also use it as a way to organize my work. So just as someone suggested "mutable revisions", there could be "irreproducible configurations"? -- Sean Shapira firstname.lastname@example.org +1 206 443 2028 Serving the Net since 1990.