Re: CHECKIN/CHECKOUT - Mutable resources and a call for consensus

Sean Shapira (sds@jazzie.com)
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:44:06 -0800 (PST)


Message-Id: <m103Q1P-000OW3C@jazzie.com>
From: sds@jazzie.com (Sean Shapira)
To: ckaler@microsoft.com (Chris Kaler)
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:44:06 -0800 (PST)
Cc: jamsden@us.ibm.com, gclemm@tantalum.atria.com, yarong@microsoft.com,
In-Reply-To: <4FD6422BE942D111908D00805F3158DF0A757BE0@RED-MSG-52> from "Chris Kaler" at Jan 21, 99 10:41:26 am
Subject: Re: CHECKIN/CHECKOUT - Mutable resources and a call for consensus

Chris Kaler wrote:
> [CK] I think this is too strong.  A way to use a configuration is for
>      reproducibility, but I don't think that is the only value of a
>      configuration.  I could also use it as a way to organize my work.

So just as someone suggested "mutable revisions", there 
could be "irreproducible configurations"?

-- 
Sean Shapira         sds@jazzie.com         +1 206 443 2028
               Serving the Net since 1990.