- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 12:25:56 -0400
- To: Hans Franke <Hans.Franke@mch20.sbs.de>, ietf-charsets@iana.org
- Cc: jfrederic.clere@fujitsu-siemens.com
At 13:25 03/10/24 +0200, Hans Franke wrote: > > The three charsets just submitted seem to be different > > (otherwise there wouldn't be three separate submissions), > > but the introductory text gives no indication of what > > the specifics of each of these registrations are, or > > how they differ. I suggest that the registration proposals > > be updated to give more details to allow readers to > > understand what the specifics of each encoding are > > without having to check all the details in the encoding > > tables. > >These Codes are EBCDIC equivalents of 8859 Variants > >OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_1 (or EDF041) -> ISO 8859-1 >OSD_EBCDIC_DF04_15 (EDF04F) -> ISO 8859-15 >(The full Name used in OSD tabes is rather EBCDIC.DF.04-F) That's what I guessed. The registrations should be updated to say so, this helps a lot. >OSD_EBCDIC_DF03_IRV (EDF03IRV) -> ISO 646 >(Which is 'Standard' EBCDIC') If that's true, then I don't see any reason to register this. There is already a registration for EBCDIC, and we don't want to register things twice. Regards, Martin.
Received on Friday, 24 October 2003 15:37:37 UTC