W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-charsets@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: internationalization/ISO10646 question

From: MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 11:11:12 +0900
To: Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@sun.com>
Cc: Marcin Hanclik <mhanclik@poczta.onet.pl>, ietf-charsets@iana.org
Message-id: <20030103103915.3B3B.MURATA@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>


> Is UTF-8 perfect?

We agree :-)

>No.  But the costs greatly outweight the benefits when 
> compared to any other charset I've seen, and particularly when compared to 
> UTF-16.

I do not agree on this claim yet.  In particular, I'm concerned with the 6-byte 
representation of non-BMP characters.  When non-BMP characters become common, 
what will happen?


MURATA Makoto <murata@hokkaido.email.ne.jp>
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 21:10:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:52:19 UTC