W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-charsets@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt(B

From: Martin Duerst(B <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 21:00:09 +0900
To: (wrong string) ‹N(B
Message-id: <4.2.0.58.J.20021101205853.03860c58@localhost>

Patrick - I posted some questions with regards to
interoperability, in particular what does it mean
to test interoperability of a 'charset' rather than
a traditional protocol. I haven't got any input on
it. What is your take?

Regards,   Martin.

At 11:22 02/11/01 +0100, Patrik F$BgM(Btstr$B‹N(B wrote:
>Any action on these issues I posted some time ago? Comments?
>
>This document _really_ need to move forward.
>
>     paf
>
>On torsdag, okt 17, 2002, at 15:23 Europe/Stockholm, Patrik F$BgM(Btstr$B‹N(B wrote:
>
>>Anyway, what needs to happen now is two things:
>>
>>  - The text in the document has to be change to say BOM is not to be used
>>  - Someone has to write down interoperability information between
>>    applications
>>
>>Regarding the interoperability, as Francois is working hard with the 
>>document, can I get someone else to write this? I myself are mostly 
>>irritated I can not copy and paste Unicode text between TextEdit and 
>>Microsoft software in MacOSX, so I might not be the best person to write 
>>down things that work.... :-(
>
Received on Friday, 1 November 2002 07:04:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 June 2006 15:10:54 GMT