Sorry for my confusing reply. Both Mark and Ken are right - Mark in interpreting what I intended to point out, and Ken in that every protocol that does _not_ claim to pass text through unchanged can forbid whichever characters and code points it wants. markus Mark Davis wrote: > ... if you > simply strip a character willy-nilly, and yet purport not to be changing > the text, you are violating Unicode conformance clause C10. ... > Of course, this is just a guess as to what Markus meant ;-) Thank you! :-) markus -- Opinions expressed here may not reflect my company's positions unless otherwise noted.Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 11:39:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 June 2006 15:10:54 GMT