Re: Comments on draft-yergeau-rfc2279bis-00.txt

Sorry for my confusing reply. Both Mark and Ken are right - Mark in interpreting what I intended to point out, and Ken in that every protocol that does _not_ claim to pass text through unchanged can forbid whichever characters and code points it wants.
markus

Mark Davis wrote:

> ... if you
> simply strip a character willy-nilly, and yet purport not to be changing
> the text, you are violating Unicode conformance clause C10. ...


> Of course, this is just a guess as to what Markus meant ;-)


Thank you! :-)


markus

-- 
Opinions expressed here may not reflect my company's positions unless otherwise noted.

Received on Friday, 18 October 2002 11:39:26 UTC